naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ME66 Noise performance was MKH 50 V ME 66

Subject: Re: ME66 Noise performance was MKH 50 V ME 66
From: "Walter Knapp" waltknapp
Date: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:12 am ((PDT))
Posted by: "John Tudor"

> Oops, my bad. I mis-read the 'type icon' on the information page. It
> is a Capacitor / Condenser mic.
>
> So, is that OK still??????

A standard condenser mic charges the diaphragm with a high voltage, the
advantage of a RF condenser is the charging is a high RF frequency and
very low voltage. A RF condensor works a lot like a FM radio as far as
separating out the audio signal, where a standard condensor is more like
AM radio in how it gets the audio off the mic. So the mics are very
different in ways other than the high charge.  That high voltage in the
standard condenser is what causes humidity problems as it will break
down under those conditions, may even arc between backplate and
diaphragm, but most of the time no damage, just lost recording. The
breakdown with some mics is only a matter of seconds. So, any condensor
mic that's not been used for nature recording should be tested for this
before depending on it. The low voltage of the RF mic is far, far more
resistant to humidity breakdown.

There are other design differences, even within different models of MKH.
  Most are now dual backplate with the diaphragm between the two
backplates for instance.  Not a common design as it's harder to build.
But it has advantages that result in better audio.

You can read about MKH here:
http://naturerecordist.home.mindspring.com/MKH_Brochure.pdf
The ME brochure is here:
http://naturerecordist.home.mindspring.com/ME_Brochure.pdf

I don't believe these are up to date anymore, do not include the latest MKH=
.

Electrets have a built in permanent static charge, so the circuitry does
not have to keep charging them.

Walt



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU