Subject: | Re: ME66 Noise performance was MKH 50 V ME 66 |
---|---|
From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio |
Date: | Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:28 am ((PDT)) |
At 1:12 PM -0400 4/16/08, Walter Knapp wrote: >The low voltage of the RF mic is far, far more >resistant to humidity breakdown. There are other design differences, >even within different models of MKH. When it comes to resistance to direct moisture, high-humidity, high heat, and extreme cold, I feel there are significant differences between capsules, electronics, mounting, housing, etc. that _can_ out-weigh the RF difference. I am impressed by my MKH's, but they do succumb to moisture every now and then. My later production serial number Rode NT2000's, which are outside in minimal attire 24-7, thoroughly amaze me. I think Sennheiser mentions resistance to high-humidity in their new 8000 series lit. It would be good for nature and field recordists if more manufacturers took-up this cause. Rob D. -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: ME66 Noise performance was MKH 50 V ME 66, Walter Knapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | affordable Holophone 5.1 mic announced, oryoki2000 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: ME66 Noise performance was MKH 50 V ME 66, Walter Knapp |
Next by Thread: | The amazing lyrebird, rchapanis |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU