| Subject: | Re: ME66 Noise performance was MKH 50 V ME 66 |
|---|---|
| From: | "" flawn1951 |
| Date: | Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:41 am ((PDT)) |
In a message dated 4/15/08 9:54:22 AM, John writes of the AT 4073A:
> This is an RF condenser as opposed to the ME66 Electret. Is this
> perhaps a better option??
>
I can't find anything in the AT 4073a's spec sheet that says it's an RF
condenser. Is there more info around about this? AFAIK Sennheiser is still =
the only
company making RF condensers, and it's that characteristic that makes their=
MKHs more resistant to high humidity problems than other mikes. Which in tu=
rn
is a good reason to consider the MKH50 or other MKH mikes if you'rfe headed=
for
the rainforest.
**************
It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money &
Finance.
(http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=3Daolcmp00300000002850)
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ME66 Noise performance was MKH 50 V ME 66, John Tudor |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ME66 Noise performance was MKH 50 V ME 66, Walter Knapp |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ME66 Noise performance was MKH 50 V ME 66, John Tudor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ME66 Noise performance was MKH 50 V ME 66, Walter Knapp |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU