naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Anyone recording "family ambience"?

Subject: Re: Anyone recording "family ambience"?
From: "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1
Date: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:15 am ((PDT))
Even more so, Lou, because sound is physical and active. Snapshots
are passive and two-dimensional. It's so important to capture and
preserve those voices of the past, whether human or non-human and
especially the latter for their lack of agendae.

Bernie


On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:25 AM, Steve Duncan wrote:

> Hi Lou,
>
> Yes, I agree, the recordings have the same kind of value as snapshots:
> priceless to those that made them, mildly interesting at best to
> everyone else.
>
> Still, it's got the same ability to take one back in time, and it's a
> lot easier than video ;-)
>
> On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Lou Judson wrote:
>
> > Funny you should ask. I recently had a project in for analog tape
> > transfers to digital. It was of a deceased classical singer, for his
> > wife.
> >
> > The concerts, radio programs, and rehearsals were facinating -
> > including an at-home rehearsal of Babar the elephant (a musical
> piece
> > similar to Peter and the Wolf).
> >
> > However, the kids playing flute, making jokes, and singing, and the
> > two hours of Christmases in the 1960s, could only be of interest to
> > family, or historians if a family member was famous enough.
> >
> > For yourself, certainly, do it. Doubt it would be of interest to
> > others though.I do like the term "Family ambience" though. Or maybe
> > personal environment?
> >
> > Just one person's opinion.
> >
> > Lou
> >
> > On Apr 16, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Steve Duncan wrote:
> >
> >> After I discovered my old voice recorder wouldn't talk to my Mac, I
> >> ordered an Olympus LS-
> >> 10, which should be arriving today. I decided on the LS-10 because
> >> I'd recorded what I guess
> >> I'll call "family ambience" a few times with my old recorder, and
> >> thought it would be even
> >> more fun now that our kids are starting to talk more. I'd once
> >> tried to make a custom
> >> ringtone for my wife of our oldest daughter's first giggles, but
> >> between noise and low signal
> >> levels it just didn't work.
> >>
> >> I suppose this is stretching the definition of nature recording,
> >> but is anyone else doing this
> >> kind of stuff?
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> > Krause
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com

Google Earth zooms: Earth.WildSanctuary.com
SKYPE: biophony










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU