naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cardiod v's omni in a reflector

Subject: Re: Cardiod v's omni in a reflector
From: "Paul Jacobson" thebrunswicktwitcher
Date: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:36 am ((PDT))
I'm not a dish user so I can't verify the veracity of this in
practice, but I was reading John Fisher's "Wildlife Sound Recording"
the other night and came across an interesting tidbit relating to
cardioid and omni's in parabolic dishes.

In Chapter 5 - Reflectors - Fisher discusses at length tests carried
out by Professor G. N. Patchett of various 24" reflectors which
showed a -7dB dip in gain  between 600-700Hz. This was attributed to
"... partial cancelation of the reflected wave by the direct sound
waves." Several pages later Fisher states "As the cardioid has very
little response from sound waves approaching from the rear, there is
no cancellation of the reflected wave  by the direct wave."

The graphs accompanying the text show the cardioid+reflector does not
suffer from the dip in gain displayed by the omni+reflector.

The text is somewhat dated, but hopeful this information is still
relevant.

cheers
Paul


On 18/07/2007, at 7:07 PM, D Secomb wrote:

> Hi all
> I know this subject as been mentioned recently. It has been mentioned
> that omni are in theory the mic to use in a reflector but several
> members state a cardioid is the better type to use. Why?
> What is the reason behind the preference? Is it gain, tone qualities,
> low gain of sound outside the focus area or is there something else?
> David





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU