| Subject: | Re: EQ recordings with parabola |
|---|---|
| From: | "Klas Strandberg" klasstrandberg |
| Date: | Sun Jun 3, 2007 3:54 am ((PDT)) |
Please go to http://www.telinga.com/gallery/picture_gallery4.htm When we made these measurements, nothing was really surprising, compared to theory. However, "everyone" has always claimed that "you must have an omni in a parabola". That is a myth. Looking at freq. behavior, a cardioid performs better. You have to pay with worse handling and wind noise, though. Klas. At 23:11 2007-06-02, you wrote: >Are there published specs on the attenuation curve by frequency for >any of the commercially available parabolas? If you are trying to be >accurate, it seems to me you could record white noise, split out the >response by frequency and then equalize the inverse. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: EQ recordings with parabola, Kevin Colver |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Panasonic triplet recording., Phil Tyler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: EQ recordings with parabola, Kevin Colver |
| Next by Thread: | Re: EQ recordings with parabola, Klas Strandberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU