>
>
>I have a Telinga with stereo DAT-Mic and I can't say I can find this at
>all.
>
>I've recorded in Hungary last month and many of the subjects were
>warblers like river warblers and sedge warblers and savi's, along with
>a good number of crickets in the environment. The frequency response of
>the Telinga did get seriously wearing after a couple of weeks of
>recording
Hi! Can you put that in other words? I don't understand.
> - I need to investigate putting my Sennheiser MKH30/40 in
>there instead and/or getting into shotgun mics for these kind of
>subjects when they're up to 20 feet away. The HF heft of the Telinga is
>probably great for its main use for birds over 50 feet away, but it's
>way OTT for closer subjects.
So what about the Acrocephalus palustris at my sound gallery? The
shortest distance is probably about 3-4 meters!? It is MP3 and un-equalized.
On the other hand I agree with you. Parabols should at the best be
used at distances over 15-20 meters. At shorter distances, other mic
set-up's are better.
But my Acrocephalus palustris could never! have been recorded with a
shot-gun. All the parabol gain was needed to put the traffic noise down.
Klas.
>The dish itself does ring probably around the frequency you mention on
>mechanical impact, which is a drag when small insects hit it, but that
>isn't anything like a continuous hum
>
>
>
>"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
>sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email:
website: www.telinga.com
|