Subject: | EQ recordings with parabola |
---|---|
From: | "Steve Pelikan" pelikan45224 |
Date: | Sat Jun 2, 2007 11:50 am ((PDT)) |
Friends: Sorry for this obviously dumb question, especially from someone who uses a parabolic reflector quite often but ... I just don't really know anyone else who does. Do people generally filter parabolic recordings to "undo" the high frequency emphasis created by the recorder? I presume that one could actually calibrate a particular reflector/microphone combination, determining gain at each frequency and then post-filter a recording to produce a flatter response? I've given some thought to actually solving the wave equation numerically and calculating the gain for a given reflector at different frequencies. All I've come up with so far is the the gain vs. frequency curve flattens out faster (meaning at lower frequencies) in larger reflectors? Does this correspond the the experience of those who've used several different sizes of reflector? Thanks for any info... Steve Pelikan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Spring in Ithaca, part 1, Scott Fraser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: EQ recordings with parabola, Jim Morgan |
Previous by Thread: | Aircraft Flights, Volker Widmann |
Next by Thread: | Re: EQ recordings with parabola, Jim Morgan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU