Subject: | Re: Spring in Ithaca, part 1 |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Sat Jun 2, 2007 11:02 am ((PDT)) |
<<Post-processing: - High-frequency rolloff beginning at about 12Khz to dampen the effect of some unwanted high frequency noise due to overzealous trim settings, mic self noise, and/or inexperience. The mp3 compression used to post the recordings rolls off some of the highs anyway, but the noise was distracting in the raw files. Any comment on the correctness of post-filtering is welcome.>> Electronic noise is broadband & not really centered anywhere in the spectrum, but if you sweep a narrow boost through the mid to high range I think you'll find our perceptions much more attuned to a lower range of noise awareness. I find a very broad cut of several octaves width by just a few db depth around 6.3kHz much more effective at knocking down noise than anything as high as 12k. Obviously you have to be very careful with any filters, as you're cutting some desirable material as well as the undesired noise. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Aircraft Flights, davidbarnas@aim.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | EQ recordings with parabola, Steve Pelikan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Spring in Ithaca, part 1, wildlifeanalysis |
Next by Thread: | Re: An unusual and straightforward public request..., Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU