Subject: | Re: Omni spacing for nature recording... |
---|---|
From: | "Greg Simmons" simmosonics |
Date: | Thu May 10, 2007 4:41 am ((PDT)) |
Steve Pelikan wrote: "I think this is because I "somehow cue in on time of arrival differences more than intensity differences in sensing the stereo effect" (though those words might not really mean anything --- it's just what I tell myself= )." Makes sense to me! Steve also wrote: "In the end when I figure this out, I think I'll end up liking the boundary scheme better. It is easy to do so you might like to give it a quick try." Thanks Steve, I'll give it a go. So much to absorb. [sigh] - Greg Simmons |
Previous by Date: | Re: Omni spacing for nature recording..., Greg Simmons |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Omni spacing for nature recording..., Greg Simmons |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Omni spacing for nature recording..., Greg Simmons |
Next by Thread: | Re: Omni spacing for nature recording..., Greg Simmons |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU