Humor aside :-),.. do you really think in 2057 that you'd have poor
regards for a newbie who turned into an accomplished recordist from
2007 to 2015? Discovering this might have quite the contrary impact
for me.
The archive notions we are considering could "situate" emotional
content in informative perspectives that go well beyond current
frustrations and feelings. I can imagine a sociologist mining the
list to study the "guy-gear thing" :-[ or even to study how fences
can be mended :-). There is always "therapy" on some level, hopefully
the advantages will out-weigh our passing frustrations.
Knowing that such a resource is being generated everyday might
encourage developing skills in civility-- perhaps by prompting a
writer to take the time needed to convert a quick, subtle "dig" into
a more reasoned, stated goal or need. Rob D.
At 6:44 AM -0500 5/7/07, Curt Olson wrote:
>Walt Knapp wrote:
>
> > For many, they are posting their first efforts. I can tell you from
>> experience that in just a short time as you gain experience you will
>> be embarrassed that those are still up where someone can listen to
>> them. They will teach errors in recording, and bad techniques in some
>> cases. And you want someone referring to that 50 years from now?
>
>So true, Walt. So personally and painfully true. I think I have some
>deleting to do...
>
>Curt Olson
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
--
Rob Danielson
Peck School of the Arts
Department of Film
University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee
|