| Subject: | Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared |
|---|---|
| From: | "Andrew Carter" standlynch |
| Date: | Tue May 1, 2007 10:25 am ((PDT)) |
Thanks Rob and Jerry for your great efforts. Klas will be pleased at the results! Being technically illiterate, could someone please explain to me what happens to the PIP mics when those of us with MD's etc move inevitably over to the new CF type recorders with phantom power. Thanks ANDREW |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | How to post sound & link files, Rob Danielson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared, Phil Tyler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared, Rob Danielson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared, Phil Tyler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU