| Subject: | Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared |
|---|---|
| From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
| Date: | Tue May 1, 2007 10:58 am ((PDT)) |
Wow! I imagined a unit like that and there it is! Are there any test results to see how the transformer affects the sound? Is it really good, or does it compromise the sound? I could use one with my 744. <L> Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio 415-883-2689 On May 1, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Phil Tyler wrote: >> Being technically illiterate, could someone please explain to me what >> happens to the PIP mics when those of us with MD's etc move inevitably >> over to the new CF type recorders with phantom power. >> Thanks >> ANDREW >> > You could use something like this: > > http://www.dacs-audio.com/Distribution/DACS/ppa_main.htm > > Phil |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared, Phil Tyler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared, Andrew Carter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared, Phil Tyler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared, Andrew Carter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU