naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared

Subject: Re: EMKS-23 & other PIP mics compared
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_rob
Date: Tue May 1, 2007 12:06 pm ((PDT))
At 6:11 PM +0100 5/1/07, Andrew Carter wrote:
>Thanks Rob and Jerry for your great efforts.
>Klas will be pleased at the results!
>Being technically illiterate, could someone please explain to me what
>happens to the PIP mics when those of us with MD's etc move inevitably
>over to the new CF type recorders with phantom power.
>Thanks
>ANDREW

Thanks Andrew-
Yes and, at last last, there are high-quality, highly compatible mics
to invest the savings from a ~$300 Hi-MD recorder into. (no extra
boxes, bulky mics etc).

Many recorders will retain 1/8" stereo PIP; I noticed the $1000 Nagra
ARES does.  PIP operation does not seem to compromise quality, so at
the point you buy a recorder with an unbalanced mic jack without PIP,
you could make a DIY battery powered supply to insert in-line (or
Klas might be able to add one to the purchase price of an EMKS-23.
Sound Professionals also sells them for around $70). The capsules can
probably be wired to run on phantom power too (though you'd need to
spend over $500 for a recorder today that can compete with HiMD/PIP
low-noise performance). I know Klas is not keen on supplying them as
phantom because PIP is just as good and so elegant.

The test is up in the gallery now:
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/audio-art-tech-gallery/pages/EMKS-23-WL183-WM-61A-=
EM158-NT4-35-0190-MicsComp.html
  Rob D.






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU