Re: budget mic choices

Subject:	Re: budget mic choices
From:	"Rich Peet" richpeet
Date:	Sat Apr 21, 2007 5:52 pm ((PDT))

--- In  Scott Fraser
<> wrote:
 Shotguns are  
> designed primarily for voice pickup at relatively close distance & do  
> some audio 'damage' in order to obtain good off axis rejection. 

Sorry, I don't buy into the design being for close distance.  Maybe
just your schooling and perspective.

All directional mics suffer on off axis.  And with this logic M/S
don't work.

Rich

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
budget mic choices, Paul Jacobson Re: budget mic choices, Danny Meltzer Re: budget mic choices, Rob Danielson Re: budget mic choices, Paul Jacobson Re: budget mic choices, Philip Tyler Re: budget mic choices, Chuck B Re: budget mic choices, Scott Fraser Re: budget mic choices, Rich Peet <= Re: budget mic choices, Fernando de Izuzquiza Re: budget mic choices, tk7859 Re: budget mic choices, Walter Knapp Re: budget mic choices, Neil Tungate Re: budget mic choices, tk7859 Re: budget mic choices, Scott Fraser Re: budget mic choices, Dan Dugan Re: budget mic choices, Paul Jacobson

Previous by Date:	Re: budget mic choices, Scott Fraser
Next by Date:	Re: budget mic choices, Fernando de Izuzquiza
Previous by Thread:	Re: budget mic choices, Scott Fraser
Next by Thread:	Re: budget mic choices, Fernando de Izuzquiza
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU