Subject: | Re: Clock test between HD-P2, 671 and SD722 |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
Date: | Thu Jan 4, 2007 10:08 am ((PST)) |
Yes, the difference between the HD-P2 and the SD722 noise levels are very small. The low-frequency rumble of the 722 section is caused by its lower cut-off frequency. Raimund > > I removed the ticks and the two gaps between the recordings, > I applied a filter which removed some of the rumble at the SD > recording and listened. > Without question, the 671 has the most audible noise, > So I removed the 671 recording and compared the Tascam and the SD. > > To my ears they sound as near one another as possible. > > Agree?? > > Klas. |
Previous by Date: | Re: Clock test between HD-P2, 671 and SD722, Klas Strandberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Clock test between HD-P2, 671 and SD722, Klas Strandberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Clock test between HD-P2, 671 and SD722, Klas Strandberg |
Next by Thread: | Re: Clock test between HD-P2, 671 and SD722, Klas Strandberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU