naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Shure VP88 vs Sennheiser MKE44-p vs ?????????

Subject: Re: Shure VP88 vs Sennheiser MKE44-p vs ?????????
From: "Brian Dasilva" brian_dasilva2002
Date: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:32 pm (PDT)
The LSD2 is the size of a 24oz beer can and very heavy.

-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Lou Judson
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 11:31 AM
To: 
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: Shure VP88 vs Sennheiser MKE44-p vs
?????????

Gee, just reading about it makes me have flashbacks! ;-)

But the lit says it's based on the C3, not the C1. Does that make a
difference?

And a question: why does it have a seven pin XLR instead of the standard 5
pin? Separate ground for each mic capsule? Must be.

Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

<L>

Lou Judson . Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Aug 27, 2006, at 11:23 AM, lampmeister wrote:

> Another mic that I've come across is the Studio Projects LSD2...no,
> seriously, that *is* the model number!
>
> http://www.studioprojects.com/lsd2.html
>
> It seems to have the perfects combination of being a single-bodied
> beast  yet having the flexibility of multiple pick-up patterns for
> each capsule. However (you just knew there'd be a downside...right?),
> it seems to be based on their C1 model, which has a self-noise of
> 17db, and I'd like to get it down to 13db or thereabouts. [sigh]



"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links











<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU