Subject: | Re: Shure VP88 vs Sennheiser MKE44-p vs ??? |
---|---|
From: | "lampmeister" lampmeister |
Date: | Sun Aug 27, 2006 7:20 am (PDT) |
Thanks everyone, some good helpful info here; appreciated. I've crossed the Pearl off my list after reading about RFI problems on other forums. I'm going to be using it in urban and rural settings and the UK is getting so crowded with mobile phones and other RFI inducing gadgets that I'm not willing to take the risk. Not at that price anyway. I've also noticed that Rode has a newish model called the NT-6, which is a small condensor. Maybe two of these would do the job and allow for flexibility when needed, especially as you can get interchangeable elements of different patterns? http://www.rodemic.com/?pagename=3DProducts&product=3DNT6 It has the same element as used in the NT5 but in a different package. I'll look into it. Any other suggestions more than welcome! Thanks y'all, Dave. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Faux Fur Group Order, John Hartog |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Shure VP88 vs Sennheiser MKE44-p vs ???, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Parabolic setup running nicely, Gianni Pavan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Shure VP88 vs Sennheiser MKE44-p vs ???, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU