naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: comparing mic specifications...

Subject: Re: comparing mic specifications...
From: "cfmspencer" cfmspencer
Date: Thu Jul 6, 2006 11:44 am (PDT)
--- In  "Bruce Wilson" 
<> wrote:
>
>  
> >At best the specs and so on might be a little help in choosing 
which 
> >mics to take out in the field with you. Then you really get to 
find out
> 
> >about the mics.
> >Walt
> 
>  "Then you really get to find out about the mics." How is a newbie
> supposed to choose his first mic? He doesn't have one yet, so 
field work
> is out. Buy mics until he has enough experience to tell which are 
better
> than others? Those living near one of the free field workshops are
> indeed fortunate, because there is a lot of good experience there 
to
> draw from, but the poor guy who doesn't know any recordists is 
left to
> his own. And when newbies ask here about what mic to get the
> recommendation from this forum is either a $1000+ do-it-all mic 
(MKH),
> or a hodge-podge of inexpensive mics ("well, my first mic was 
a ....").
> 
> I think newbies especially worry over specs because that's about 
all
> they have to go with. The push to not create a recommended mics 
list
> have left the neophyte with no other way of comparing mics other 
than
> price and specs. 
> 
> We're smart guys, and there is a lot of experience here. Shouldn't 
it be
> possible to organize our thoughts into recommended mics for 
different
> applications, divided into cost classes? I propose we make the dang
> list. It's not like we'll put crappy mics in the list that will 
stick
> someone with a mic they can't use.
> 
> Applications like:
> 
> Ambient soundscapes (wide-angle, low volume)
> Individual animals (narrow-angle, low volume)
> Cityscapes (mid to high volume)
> Underwater (hydrophones)
> Direct contact
> Anything else?
> 
> Price class, per stereo system:
> 
> Inexpensive $0-$300
> Midrange $300-$600
> Expensive $600+
> 
> 
> If not a recommendation list, then a list of people on the list 
willing
> to be a mentor (or Elmer, as we call them in ham radio) either 
online or
> for newbies in your area.
> 
> Other recommends I'd like to see here: how to make blimps and what 
cover
> material to use, stereo techniques and which work well for some 
example
> situations (including mic mounts/stands), how to not record 
yourself,
> how to not scare the animals, maybe even the habits of various
> noise-making creatures (like why eagles call and the best times to
> record them), man-made sounds and how to avoid them, audio 
processing
> for more realistic recordings, and other more esoteric stuff like 
where
> to put your mics in a canyon or near a cliff to get the best 
echoes.
> 
> These topics have (mostly) all been discussed here, but they are
> difficult to find in a search through past messages.
> 
> Bruce Wilson KF7K
> http://science.uvsc.edu/wilson
>


Bruce, I second your suggestions above,
and reiterate that newbies in fact could benefit greatly
from a resources such as this, although I also understand
the downside of 'recommended' lists.

I can provide some legwork/support for the data, if needed,
as I am still in research gathering/analysis mode of my
own 'list' of potential microphones.

advice on eagles would also be useful,
I was videotaping (in High Definition with 500mm lens) a male Bald 
Eagle just yesterday, and I was much, much further away than I 
wanted to be, with a swamp between he and I, and with no MKH-70 in 
sight.


clay










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU