Subject: | Re: comparing mic specifications... |
---|---|
From: | "Ed Anson" ed_anson |
Date: | Tue Jul 4, 2006 6:03 pm (PDT) |
I'd say it depends on what you are recording. If you are recording a relatively loud sound, higher sensitivity trumps noise up to a point. But if you are recording a quiet ambience that is relatively near the self noise level of the mic, then a quieter mic would be preferred. On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:22 PM, cfmspencer wrote: > in comparing the likely usefulness of mics for > quiet ambient nature recordings, I've been > dividing the sensitivity spec figure by the > noise spec figure and ranking mics relatively > based on the result. > > by this method, a Sanken mic with 20db noise > and 50mV output would rank higher than a Sennheiser > with only 12 db noise and 25mV. > > does this seem a reasonable way to compare, or is > lower noise ultimately more important than higher > output? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: comparing mic specifications..., Bruce Wilson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: comparing mic specifications..., Bruce Wilson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: comparing mic specifications..., Bruce Wilson |
Next by Thread: | Re: comparing mic specifications..., Bruce Wilson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU