Subject: | Re: comparing mic specifications... |
---|---|
From: | "cfmspencer" cfmspencer |
Date: | Tue Jul 4, 2006 4:22 pm (PDT) |
--- In Walter Knapp <> wrote: > > Posted by: "cfmspencer" > > > I'll look into the Pearls. > > If I remember right the Pearls are about 16-18dBA self noise and > 18-20mV/Pa sensitivity. Not the best though for louder sites they might > work. thanks Walt. in comparing the likely usefulness of mics for quiet ambient nature recordings, I've been dividing the sensitivity spec figure by the noise spec figure and ranking mics relatively based on the result. by this method, a Sanken mic with 20db noise and 50mV output would rank higher than a Sennheiser with only 12 db noise and 25mV. does this seem a reasonable way to compare, or is lower noise ultimately more important than higher output? yes, I know, it's not all about specs, and that I will need to work with mics to truly determine what works best for me. thanks Clay |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Oktava mk series figure eight capsule, Walter Knapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: comparing mic specifications..., Bruce Wilson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: comparing mic specifications..., Julius Thyssen |
Next by Thread: | Re: comparing mic specifications..., Bruce Wilson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU