naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Shotguns for Nature Recording

Subject: Re: Shotguns for Nature Recording
From: "Rich Peet" richpeet
Date: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:02 pm (PDT)
--- In  "Rich Peet" <> wrote:
>

> I will try and build an interference tube for my wl183 this week and
> post an example to show if it works or not.

Ok, so what happens when you take a copper tube and just screw the
math and start cutting slots into it to build a interference tube
shotgun mic?

http://home.comcast.net/~richpeet/wl183-shotgun.jpg

I ran out of fine sawblades as these break about every 6" I cut.
But I came close to completion.

Ran it through the cooledit/audition to test the results.

This was not a controlled test and was just done in my work area at 10
feet from the speaker.

The mic "on" target with the tube showed a 10 db cut from 3 to 5.5
thousand cycles compared to the matched one mounted above.  It
performed about the same in the rest of the spectrum.

"Off" axis the mic off target with the tube showed a 20 db cut from 3
to 5.5 thousand cycles comapred to the matched one mounted above.  It
performed about the same in the rest of the spectrum.

Translated this means it will continue to be something fun to play
with but Walt is right in that it will take better quality mics to
play in shotguns.

Rich Peet









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU