Subject: | Re: Shotguns for Nature Recording |
---|---|
From: | "Curt Olson" flipov411 |
Date: | Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:56 am (PDT) |
Rich Peet wrote: > Maybe a wider cut would extend lower. > Maybe an outside test without walls will show a better front to side > response on my mic. > Maybe we can optimize a shotgun for bird song rather than voice. > Maybe a card mic would work better than an omni. > And what the hell does the diameter of the tube have to do with > anything? > > Let the play begin. > I hope someone trys this as well. Rich, I have a pair of 184s, cardioid cousins to the 183s. They're too noisy for any serious recording, but they might be perfect for this experiment of yours. I'd be happy to loan them to the cause. Give me a call if you want... Curt Olson |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Shotguns for Nature Recording, stoatwizard |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Shotguns for Nature Recording, Rich Peet |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Shotguns for Nature Recording, stoatwizard |
Next by Thread: | Re: Shotguns for Nature Recording, Rich Peet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU