| Subject: | Re: Shotguns for Nature Recording |
|---|---|
| From: | "stoatwizard" stoatwizard |
| Date: | Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:01 am (PDT) |
--- In "Rich Peet" <> > Maybe we can optimize a shotgun for bird song rather than voice. > Maybe a card mic would work better than an omni. > And what the hell does the diameter of the tube have to do with anything? > > Let the play begin. > I hope someone trys this as well. This article http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=3D11178 looks like it might be useful, if only it were'nt behind a $$$ lockdown. It would be nice to start with a view of the theory. I've looked at my MKE300 and it does have an inner tube with holes. Which is good - much easier to experiment with holes than slots I figure |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Producing clear sonograms, Walter Knapp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Shotguns for Nature Recording, Curt Olson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Producing clear sonograms, recordingbird@gmx.de |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Shotguns for Nature Recording, Curt Olson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU