naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pmd660

Subject: Re: pmd660
From: Dan Dugan <>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:32:23 -0800
>It perplexes me at
>this juncture in recording technology that one
>manufacturer can turn out a "consumer" recorder
>with very high gain, very low noise, ample
>headroom and very acceptable sounding A-D, while
>another will turn out a recorder for the "pro"
>market with poor mic pre performance listed for
>double the cost.

I think it has to do with audio engineering, and the lack thereof.
Manufacturers of digital products may assume, wrongly, that the
analog parts of the circuitry are easy and copy something out of a
book.

Remember that the professional market is now populated by people who,
in the majority, have very little audio engineering knowledge. A
market that used to be spec-driven is now hype-driven.

There's still some use for us old farts with our instruments.

-Dan Dugan


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU