naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: field test of Audio-Technica 3032 mics

Subject: Re: field test of Audio-Technica 3032 mics
From: Dan Dugan <>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:33:38 -0800
DAN DUGAN:
>  > I've only examined the 3032 at 44.1 sampling rate, but it looks like
>>  it's going strong at 20K. Sound Devices publishes the response of
>>  their preamps hidden somewhere on their web site, but I can't find it
>  > today. As I recall they're good to at least 50K.

I found it:

http://www.sounddevices.com/tech/7series-bandwidth.htm

Looks like 3 dB down is around 100K.

>  > Next time I have access to a 722 I'll try a night recording at high
>>  sampling rate with 3032s, and slow it down with SoundHack or
>  > something. Thanks for the idea.

Bill Rainey:
>That would be very interesting, but some of the higher intensity bats could be
>present in your 44.1 recordings, as their calls include the 16-22 
>kHz interval.
>In a sonogram you would see 4 to10+ millisecond tonal pulses at intervals on
>the order of 100-150 ms. These could be nearly constant frequency, but are
>more likely to be declining FM sweeps from above the Nyqvist.

A couple of months ago I recorded Mexican free-tailed bats, and they 
had a lot of chatter audible and visible at the top end of the audio 
spectrum in my 183s/MD recording.

>As Gianni Pavan pointed out long ago, the antialiasing filters on the Sony
>consumer DATs are quite 'soft'.  With a microphone which didn't roll off at 20
>kHz, some  bat calls were often aliased down in 48 kHz tape recordings. The
>aliased calls sweep 'the wrong way' for North American temperate zone bats,
>so they're usually easy to recognize by eyeball.
>
>I fail to recall if Gianni (or others?) have reported bench testing the
>antialiasing filters of the 722, but you might have material for a biological
>assessment  at 44.1.

I examined the top ends of my three night sessions (the sunrise 
sessions had rain noise.) In one, made at the entrance (riparian 
foliage), I see a very faint series of clicks centered around 14 KHz, 
repeating two or three per second, in strings a few seconds long with 
a break and then on again, rather consistently. The hum of 
refrigeration compressors from the cafe was quite audible there, so 
it could have been something from that. Nothing in the Ben Johnson 
Trail silence (conifer forest), and nothing on the Dipsea Trail 
(riparian).

-Dan Dugan


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________


"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU