naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MT2496 digital input

Subject: Re: MT2496 digital input
From: Lou Judson <>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:28:32 -0700
Thanks Allen. I'd never counted the steps before! ;-) Have you tested
this and seen results on screen? I'll have to try it sometime...

<L>

Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Oct 19, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Allen Cobb wrote:

> Regarding +-32700 --
>
> With a 16-bit sample size (as used by music CD's, etc.) you can
> count up to 65,536 (including the starting zero). If you take
> one bit to indicate whether the number is positive or negative,
> that cuts the total counting range to 32,768 (or 32700 for
> short).
>
> So "plus" 32700 is the highest point on a waveform and "minus"
> 32700 is the lowest. In other words, in a graphic picture of an
> audio wave, zero is the center line, and Full Scale is plus or
> minus 32700.
>
> If you drew a wave form (one cycle is all you need) that is just
> a square shape with, say, 22 samples at plus 32700 and 22
> samples at minus 32700, you'd have a harmonic-rich full-scale
> signal at 1 kilohertz.
>
> You get the +-32700 wave height by making sure the waveform
> display is not zoomed in vertically, and then zooming in
> *horizontally* until the individual sample "dots" are showing.
> Then just drag the pencil tool at the top and bottom of the wave
> display. Once you have one cycle, you can copy/paste it a few
> times, then reselect them all and copy/paste again, and end up
> with as much time duration of the 1kHz squarewave signal as you
> like.
>
> There are other issues involved in dealing with such a violent
> signal in digital equipment, but this how you could make one
> without special software.
>
> To validate that a recorder is just cloning the input byte
> stream, it probably doesn't matter much what the wave *shape*
> is, so long as it goes full scale. I'm not sure about that, but
> it seems reasonable that just about anything full scale would
> get significantly messed with if it goes through another DA/AD
> conversion. I would think that just 1 cycle, comprising a single
> sample at plus full scale and the next sample at minus full
> scale, would validate that an input is pure digital -- but I
> haven't tested that.
>
> ac
>
>
> Allen Cobb
> 
> http://acobb.com
> http://shakespeare.acobb.com
> http://timbreproductions.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
>  Behalf Of Lou Judson
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 6:25 PM
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] MT2496 digital input
>
>
> Ah, very clear. That would indeed be a severe test for any
> convertor!
> I'll have to suggest it sometime on an audio elist I'm on.
>
> Thanks for the details. But what does the +or-32700 mean? So
> many
> questions...
>
> <L>
>
> Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio
> 415-883-2689
>
> On Oct 19, 2005, at 10:01 AM, Allen Cobb wrote:
>
>> In most waveform editing programs (such as Sony SoundForge)
> you
>> can "draw" waveforms or drag individual samples to whatever
>> level you want. In SoundForge, you can use the "insert
> silence"
>> command to create a short wave comprising only zero samples.
>> Then with the "pencil tool" you can drag individual samples to
> +
>> or - 0db FS (that is, all the way up or all the way down).
> Just
>> don't play the result through your sound system unless the
> level
>> is set very low!
>>
>> ac
>>
>>
>> Allen Cobb
>> 
>> http://acobb.com
>> http://shakespeare.acobb.com
>> http://timbreproductions.com
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: 
>>  Behalf Of Lou
> Judson
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 11:01 AM
>> To: 
>> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] MT2496 digital input
>>
>>
>> Can you describe what you mean by this file? How do you make
> it?
>> Sorry
>> if it is a dumb question...
>>
>> <L>
>>
>> Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio
>> 415-883-2689
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2005, at 12:37 AM, Gianni Pavan wrote:
>>
>>> Create an "impossible" file with samples alternating
>> among -max and
>>> +max (-32700,+32700,-32700,+32700,....)
>>> Play the file through a digital output
>>
>>
>> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
>> Sponsor --------------------~-->
>> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo!
> your
>> home page
>> http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/PMYolB/TM
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>> ----~->
>>
>> "Microphones are not ears,
>> Loudspeakers are not birds,
>> A listening room is not nature."
>> Klas Strandberg
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Microphones are not ears,
>> Loudspeakers are not birds,
>> A listening room is not nature."
>> Klas Strandberg
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
> Sponsor --------------------~-->
> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your
> home page
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/PMYolB/TM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> ----~->
>
> "Microphones are not ears,
> Loudspeakers are not birds,
> A listening room is not nature."
> Klas Strandberg
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Microphones are not ears,
> Loudspeakers are not birds,
> A listening room is not nature."
> Klas Strandberg
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU