naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft procedure for amateur recording in parks, v. 2

Subject: Re: draft procedure for amateur recording in parks, v. 2
From: Dan Dugan <>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:38:55 -0700
Lou, you wrote,

>I find that my own (intuitive) calibration works fine for my
>own uses - and coordinates well with Dan's rigorous scientific method:

Actually, my method is quasi-scientific; even if the SLM you set the
monitor levels with has up-to-date traceable calibration, the
frequency response of the monitors is unknown (the reason for using
band-limited 200-2K noise), the mics aren't qualified for measurement
purposes, etc. My intention is to achieve something
"good-enough-to-be-scientifically-useful," rather than "rigorous."

If these recordings were to show up in a court case with an air tour
manager or snowmobile renter, I predict their expert would tear them
to shreds. But for park management purposes--the stuff we can do is
heavenly.

There's still plenty of work for the real acoustical pros.

-Dan Dugan


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU