| Subject: | Re: Rode NT1-A's Night Sequence |
|---|---|
| From: | Walter Knapp <> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:35:43 -0400 |
From: "Greg Weddig" <> > > Just to second what Dan said, I have been experimenting with two sites > for sharing some field recording "snippets".=20 > > One is the internet archive: http://www.archive.org (if you search for > "weddig" (without the "n") you will find a bunch of my files). As Dan > said I upload a full bandwidth wav file, then the archive > automatically derives several lossless, lossy, and streaming formats. How much of a hit to sound quality does their processing create? Have you done comparisons of their various formats? Although I have about 100 megs of webspace through my ISP, this is often stuffed with all the various things I have up. Walt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Sennheiser MKH capsule design, Walter Knapp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: The Rode NT1A, Klas Strandberg |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Rode NT1-A's Night Sequence, Rob Danielson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Rode NT1-A's Night Sequence, Walter Knapp |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU