naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: intro & Qs

Subject: Re: intro & Qs
From: Walter Knapp <>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:03:32 -0500
From: Rob Danielson <>

>
> At 10:31 PM -0800 2/21/05, Ken  Durling wrote:
>
>>>At 08:44 PM 2/21/2005, you wrote:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>
>>>>>Here's one example. I made a stereo recording with 21" spaced omnis
>>>>>of a large flock of seagulls circling above me about 10-75' feet for
>>>>>about 3 minutes. Listening at home,  I noticed that my ability to
>>>>>track the bird motions in stereo was limited to 2, at most 3 birds at
>>>>>a time even though 10 or more were calling in flight at any given
>>>>>moment. My attention seemed geared to pick out only the closer moving
>>>>>birds with the rest of the birds becoming a stationary background
>>>>>plane in my mind. I would guess that the further away the birds, the
>>>>>more difficult it would be to articulate their motion.
>>
>>>
>>>Interesting - might it not have been more discernible with directional
>>>mics?  I haven't done much with this, but accurate imaging requires care=
ful
>>>phase control too, as I understand it.
>
>
> As per your interest in portraying many birds in motion, its possible
> there are limits as to how many objects one can perceive as being in
> motion at once within a stereo or guad field.

This is a fairly well known characteristic of our hearing. We tend to
filter out or merge most sound into the background and focus on a
limited number of sounds at a time. We may shift from sound to sound
doing this, or follow a single set of sounds. Our ability to filter
sounds far exceeds what we can do with computers.

I'll point out the book "Ecological Psychoacoustics" as being a good one
on current thinking on the subject. There is a merging of lab
psychoacoustics with the more outdoor studies of hearing going on. The
lab predictions often fail when confronted with real life hearing
situations.

You are probably fighting a uphill battle trying to get your listener's
to lock into the whole. Locking into some birds while having a swirling
background of more birds is more likely.

Walt




________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU