naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Minidisk data transfer and bat recordings

Subject: Re: Minidisk data transfer and bat recordings
From: Syd Curtis <>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 22:00:58 +1000
I have not followed this technical discussion, but wonder if I'd be in orde=
r
suggesting a possible qualification to one minor non-technical bit of
Walter's advice.  (If this has already been covered, I apologise.)  Walter
wrote:

> From: Walter Knapp <>
> To: 

> I really think that copying all that large amount of recording into the
> computer is not the way to go. It's going to eat hard disks like mad,
> and will use time that it's not necessary to use. You are much better
> standardizing on a system where the initial sort is done by listening to
> the recording on the original medium and only selectively transferring.
> Best if you have people who can do the selective transfers on the fly as
> they listen. That is unless you can come up with computer software
> that's reliable enough at doing the original analysis. Even there it
> might do that without transferring.

If one does have a generous HD capacity, it may be worth while copying all
of a large recording into a computer, providing what one looks for is easil=
y
recognisable on the computer screen.

Two species of cicadas, and two species of birds presently sing
intermittently in my garden.  I was able to add an 80 GB HD to my Mac G3 fo=
r
a surprisingly small cost.  With PEAK LE software I can easily see on the
spectrograph trace on the computer screen, when a cicada or bird was singin=
g
nearby.  So ...

I can set my Tascam to record a 125 minute DAT while I do other things;
then set the G3 to copy the Tascam's digital signal, again doing other
things while that is done.  Peak allows the Spectrograph trace to be
expanded or contracted at the click of a mouse, and to jump forward a scree=
n
at a time again with the click of a mouse.  I can quickly scan the whole
recording in that way.

I note the time at the beginning and end of each period where nothing is
happening, and after I've thus gone through the whole recording, I can then
delete and replace with a second of silence, each period that I don't want.

This leaves me with the useful parts of the original 125 minutes, and the
facility, if I wish, to relate any part of it to the actual time when it
happened.

At that stage, assuming it's now down to less than 80 minutes, I can set th=
e
G3 to copy it to a CD if I don't want to work on it immediately, and when
that is done, delete it from the HD and reuse the 125 min. DAT.

I hope this is more help than nuisance.

Syd Curtis (Brisbane, Australia)



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________




------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU