Rich Peet wrote:
>>Have you found much difference in the MKH-110-1? Other than the
>
> obvious
>
>>going down to 0.1hz. As I remember it's supposed to be less
>
> sensitive.
>
>>And how did you determine it was that model?
>>
>
>
> At first I thought I wired the things wrong. When that was ruled out
> I noticed that the tube out of the back of the capsule was different.
>
> Then I compared the freq response and found that the curve was not
> the same. For ambience recordings I actually have to boost the low
> freqs on a curve about 3 db. below 500 or so on the low freq
> version. It appears the difference is in the vent.
According to the transcripts of Sennheiser's talks on how they did it
the capillary vent tube is a very critical component. So, it's not
surprising that it's different.
It does indeed sound like it's sensitivity is different.
> And so I play.
That's really what this is, play. If I ever forget how to play it will
be time to go. No use living then.
Walt
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|