Subject: | Re: First attempt at thunderstorm recordings |
---|---|
From: | "Rich Peet" <> |
Date: | Sat, 23 Aug 2003 02:05:45 -0000 |
> Have you found much difference in the MKH-110-1? Other than the obvious > going down to 0.1hz. As I remember it's supposed to be less sensitive. > And how did you determine it was that model? > At first I thought I wired the things wrong. When that was ruled out I noticed that the tube out of the back of the capsule was different. Then I compared the freq response and found that the curve was not the same. For ambience recordings I actually have to boost the low freqs on a curve about 3 db. below 500 or so on the low freq version. It appears the difference is in the vent. And so I play. Rich Peet ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | What's That Sound? - Kazoo, Doug Von Gausig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Fwd: Oil and Gas Noise, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: First attempt at thunderstorm recordings, Walter Knapp |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re: First attempt at thunderstorm recordings, Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU