Subject: | Re: consumer vs pro minidisc |
---|---|
From: | Doug Von Gausig <> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:56:15 -0700 |
At 05:30 PM 10/14/2002, the highly esteemed Walter Knapp wrote: >Having used both consumer minidisc and pro minidisc recorders, I've got >some feel for the difference. Consumer minidisc does not have as good a >mic preamp as a pro minidisc does, Hey Walt, Would you mind giving us a short primer on just what the better pre-amps give us that is lacking in consumer recorders? Lower noise, better "headroom", less overloading - what's it all mean from a practical perspective in the field? Doug *************************************** Doug Von Gausig Digitally Recorded Birds Sounds at: http://naturesongs.com/birds.html Clarkdale, Central Arizona, USA 34=B046.34N 112=B003.25W e-mail: *************************************** [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Digital over mod? was:New to list and interested in grasshoppe=, Gianni Pavan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Digital over mod? /grasshopper distortion, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: consumer vs pro minidisc, DeafinONEear |
Next by Thread: | Re: consumer vs pro minidisc, Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU