The difference is very clear by comparing non-compressed and compressed
signals with the same software and settings. The software I use is designed
to provide high time resolution and I'm sure what I see is not an analysis
artifact. Moreover it doesnot appear on the original signal.
Gianni
At 19.04 01/04/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>...
>Are you doing a sonogram or just looking at the raw waveform? If you are
>doing a sonogram are you sure what you are seeing is not an anomaly of
>the particular FFT routine your software uses. At 10 ms you are not
>talking all that many samples. The FFT routines have their own
>anomalies, which are much more severe than those produced by
>compression. This seems to be particularly true right around loud sounds.
>
>Have you tested your analysis using different software? There is quite a
>bit of variability in the display you get from different software. Or
>even within different software at different settings.
>
>Walt
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Gianni Pavan
Email
Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
Universita' degli Studi di Pavia
Via Taramelli 24, 27100 PAVIA, ITALIA
Tel/Fax +39-0382-525234 Laboratori
Tel/Fax +39-0382-526208 Segreteria
Web http://www.unipv.it/cibra
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|