birding-aus

RFI re 8x42 v 10x 42

To:
Subject: RFI re 8x42 v 10x 42
From: "Chris Sanderson" <>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:23:50 +1000
Hi David,

Are you a bush birder, a rainforest birder or a seabirder?  Each different
type of birding is suited by different kinds of binoculars.  As previously
stated 10x (which I use) are much harder to hold steady, and harder to
actually find birds with (you need to develop good technique in challenging
environments like pelagic boats and rainforest).  8x is easier to hold
steady, but doesn't bring you as close to a bird, so for small birds like
thornbills, or birds difficult to get close to you might prefer 10x.  In the
end its personal preference, I've met a few birders who use 7x, and one who
uses 12x.

Regards,
Chris

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Alistair McKeough <
> wrote:

> David
>
> All other things being equal, the 8x will have a wider field of view, be
> easier to hold steady and have marginally better performance in low light.
>
> The 10x will allow you to resolve more detail at distance *if you can hold
> it steady*.
>
> It's very much a matter of personal preference. I would use 10x if I could
> hold them steady, including occasionally one-handed. I cannot, and so I use
> 8.5x.
>
> Alistair
>
>
>
> 2008/6/23 Peter Shute <>:
>
> > 10x42s should have a 4.2mm exit pupil compared to 5.25mm on the 8x42s,
> > so in theory shouldn't be as bright in low light.  Has anyone actually
> > tested this and found it to matter?
> >
> > I guess the 10x's should be heavier and have a narrower field of view,
> > but that would depend on the model.  I have a pair of 8x42s and a pair
> > of 10x50s, but the 10x50s are so ancient that they don't compare in any
> > way - poor relief, no coatings, close focus long enough to be a
> > hinderence.
> >
> > Peter Shute
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: 
> > >  On Behalf Of David Kowalick
> > > Sent: Monday, 23 June 2008 10:02 AM
> > > To: 
> > > Subject: [Birding-Aus] RFI re 8x42 v 10x 42
> > >
> > >
> > > For anyone in the know I am looking to purchase a new pair of
> > > bins in the mid range and so far I have been using 8x 42 but
> > > many birdos swear by the 10x. Which is the way to go? Apart
> > > from the obvious magnification the field of view differences
> > > what are the other pros and cons??
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: 
> >
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> ===============================
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU