birding-aus

Black Noddy ethics

To: "'Steve Murray'" <>, "'David Stowe'" <>, "'Birding-aus Aus'" <>
Subject: Black Noddy ethics
From: "Gregory Little" <>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 19:13:46 +1000
Steve & all

I agree, a confirmed mental image of seeing the bird is a positive tick.
A "I must have seen it" is not a mental image of seeing the bird and
therefore not a tick.

While on the subject of bird watching and ticking. When I was younger it
was impressed on me by some serious birders that "tickers" were not real
bird watchers. I carried that with me for many years and condemned
tickers when really I did not know what ticking was. Wasted many years.
Have since met some pretty serious bird watchers who would be considered
tickers. I can say that they enjoy their bird watching as much as
anybody and know as much if not more about their birds as anyone else.
For me now compiling a list of seen and target species and researching
these allows me to systematically focus effort and expense on new birds
and is very rewarding. When visiting a location during a limited holiday
break one can really only afford to have the best look at each of as
many birds as possible within the time available and move on.

Greg Little



-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Steve Murray
Sent: Wednesday, 9 May 2007 9:01 AM
To: 'David Stowe'; 'Birding-aus Aus'
Subject: Black Noddy ethics

Dave...It all comes down to how you define things. If you are talking
about
a list of birds you have seen, then I definitely would not tick it. Just
because a bird has been in your field of vision doesn't mean you have
seen
it. Imagine if you were with a group of birders and they later said to
you:
"Did you see the Black Noddy?" and you replied, "No", and then they
said:
"Well, you were looking right at it!" You wouldn't tick it on the
strength
of that would you? I think that, semantically, saying you have "seen"
something implies a conscious perception at the time of seeing. You have
'seen' a Black Noddy in your photograph, that is all. My opinion.
Steve Murray

-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of David Stowe
Sent: Tuesday, 8 May 2007 9:46 PM
To: Birding-aus Aus
Subject: Black Noddy ethics

Some of you may have read my recent posts about a trip to Michelmas  
Cay last week and the fact that i didn't see any Black Noddy's.
Well I am just going through my photos in more detail and i have  
found a Black Noddy in a photo!!
Does it count as a tick or not??




===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.6/794 - Release Date: 8/05/2007
2:23 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.6/794 - Release Date: 8/05/2007
2:23 PM
 

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU