birding-aus
|
To: | Peter Shute <> |
---|---|
Subject: | SLR without the mirror |
From: | Carl Clifford <> |
Date: | Fri, 3 Feb 2012 19:04:55 +1100 |
Peter,I think it may be some time before electronic viewfinders will out-do a good split-screen optical viewfinder. Cheers, Carl Clifford On 03/02/2012, at 4:26 PM, Peter Shute wrote:I do think that mirrorless cameras is where photography is heading, and it's good to see a manufacturer maintaining compatibility with current and legacy lenses. But this camera has neither optical nor electronic viewfinder, not even as an option, so I hope it's not where bird photography is heading. I think an electronic viewfinder is potentially better than an optical one if the resolution is good enough, but it's disappointing that there are so many photographers who don't need one at all that manufacturers can simply leave it out. I suspect that some time in the future the viewfinder/no viewfinder divide may be bigger than the mirror/no mirror one. Peter Shute -------------------------- Sent using BlackBerry |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | SLR without the mirror, Carl Clifford |
---|---|
Next by Date: | No trace so far of kidnapped European birdwatchers in Tawi-Tawi, Carl Clifford |
Previous by Thread: | SLR without the mirror, Paul & Irene Osborn |
Next by Thread: | SLR without the mirror, Peter Shute |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU