> From:
> On Behalf Of peter crow
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 March 2010 11:39 AM
> To:
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] afo
> I know what its like to have ago and be rejected. I have
> written a number of short reports suitable researched and
> reviewed but have always got a reply along the lines of "Its
> not of great deal of interest --- Its probably something
> that is common -- We usually don't publish short articles."
I'm new to all this stuff. Can you explain why these things need to actually
be published in a magazine? Lots of observations, although obviously not as
well researched as you indicate yours were, and rarely referenced at all, get
"published" just by being mentioned in places like birding-aus. I can see that
they might not be regarded as being as trustworthy and quotable as an article
in a magazine, but at least they're out there to be read.
And won't Wingspan and TBO accept them?
Peter Shute
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
=============================
|
