birding-aus

Fig Parrot species

To: "'Tim Murphy'" <>
Subject: Fig Parrot species
From: "Tony Russell" <>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:46:49 +1030
As Andrew Adcock just restated ' a list is a personal thing, do whatever
makes you happiest'. I agree with this . I'm a twitcher.

 As a twitcher I tend to be a 'splitter' largely following Schodde's
listings for Australia, but of course have no scientific status in this
forum so when a new bird is called and I see it I tend to tick it and
let the experts argue about it for the next ' n' months or years through
BARC or whatever.  It's what turns them on, but I have no intention of
waiting off for their decisions. If they subsequently dismiss a sighting
which I have earlier ticked, it's easy enough to delete it from my
tally. Given the recent results of BARC deliberations published in a
recent Wingspan one could wait as much as five or even eight  years for
an answer, and given my present age I may not have that long to wait. (
crosses himself and says ten Hail Marys).
Tony.
Science is great but who wants to wait ?

All flack gratefully received.

-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Tim Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 6:51 PM
Cc: 
Subject: Fig Parrot species


The DNA analysys for sibling species is best done with mitocondrial DNA
as it changes faster..

AS you will know, most DNA is silent (has no know biological function)
and so you can compare mtDNA in the same silent gap for many related
species. It is an oversimplification to say that <x% difference - same
species, >x% different species, but that is the rough idea.

Googel will

-----Original Message-----
From: 
 Behalf Of Evan Beaver
Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2006 5:58 PM
Cc: 
Subject: Fig Parrot species


At the risk of getting too technical, how does DNA evidence
prove/disprove whether or not they are the same species? Given that DNA
is just a sequence of genes do they just draw a line 40 genes along the
sequence and declare "if it's the same to here they are the same
species". DNA or otherwise, isn't species level classification a
biological construct based on grouping similarities?

Evan

On 11/14/06, Michael Todd <> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Yep, the DNA results will be very interesting. I think everybody needs

> to calm down about the fig parrot debate. We should all just wait and 
> see what comes out.
>
> Incidentally, I was talking to Glenn Holmes this evening . He reported

> 10 Swinhoe's Snipe, 1 Wood Sandpiper and 3 Marsh Sandpiper from 
> Hasties Swamp on the Atherton Tableland today.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mick
>
> Michael Todd
> Wildlifing Images & Sounds of Nature
> Latest Additions: Barking Owl, Splendid Fairy-wren, Mulga Parrot 
> www.wildlifing.com Toronto, NSW, Australia O41O 123715
>
>
> Carl Clifford wrote:
> > Well, this seems to be the logical way to determine the authenticity

> > of the proposed species/sub-species. I will wait for such evidence 
> > before making my mind up. Carl Clifford
> >
> > On 14/11/2006, at 12:11 PM, Tim Murphy wrote:
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > Tim Murphy
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:  
> >  Behalf Of michael 
> > hunter
> > Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 11:00 AM
> > To: Syd Curtis; 
> > Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Fig Parrot species
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >           Can DNA analysis can be performed on feathers or faeces?
> >            If so, and if John found a nesting-hole as reported, and 
> > someone to climb up into the clouds, the species dilemma could 
> > quickly be resolved.
> >                                      Cheers
> >                                              Michael
> >
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to:  
> > ===============================
> >
> >
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to:  
> > ===============================
> >
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,send the message: 
> > unsubscribe(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to:  
> > ===============================
> >
> >
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:  ===============================
>



--
Evan Beaver
Lapstone, Blue Mountains, NSW
lat=-33.77, lon=150.64
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:  ===============================


===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:  ===============================

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU