ts-7000
[Top] [All Lists]

[ts-7000] Re: Recommended Linux Distribution for Development on Linux Ho

To:
Subject: [ts-7000] Re: Recommended Linux Distribution for Development on Linux Host
From: "Eduardo Mendiola" <>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:32:55 -0000
By using tune2fs, I was able to change the frequency in which fsck 
is executed so I got further... 

$tune2fs -c 50 -C 0 /dev/sda1

This will execute fsck every 50 times I mount the CF card.

-Eduardo


--- In  "Eduardo Mendiola" <> 
wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
> 
> The ts9 kernel compiles fine under Debian 3.1 sarge. 
> 
> I'm testing with the TS-7200 + TS-7KV + and a 512MB CF card.
> 
> The reason why I was getting confused with the versions is that 
I've 
> noticed the following: 
> 
> A) If I format the CF card with Debian 3.1, and load the Debian 
3.0 
> filesystem (tar file provided by TS), then the system complains 
> about needing to upgrade fsck and e2fsk. Debian 3.0 uses fsck 
> version 1.27 and Debian 3.1 uses 1.37.
> 
> If I use the Debian 3.1 filesystem provided by TS, it doesn't 
> complain about the fsck version, but it then fails to load the ts9 
> kernel modules. The /lib/modules directory contains the ts10 
kernel 
> modules. 
> 
> This leads me to believe TS only supports the TS-7KV with a ts9 
> kernel with Debian 3.0 filesystem. Then, I just need to format the 
> CF card using Debian Woody, instead of Sarge.
> 
> B) The system "always" performs an integrity test on the CF card. 
> This delays the boot time. It says the filesystem has not been 
> checked for over 49,000 days. Let me know if you have suggestions 
on 
> how to work around it.
> 
> I'll let you know how it goes.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Eduardo
> 
> 
> --- In  Joe Bouchard <jbouchard@> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:13:28PM -0000, Eduardo Mendiola wrote:
> > > I have a TS-7200 (ts9) and a CF with a 3.0 Debian filesystem. 
> What is 
> > > the recommended distribution version for a Linux host (Woody)? 
> Is it 
> > > Debian 3.0 R2, Debian 3.0 R4 or Debian 3.0 R6? Does it make a 
> > > difference?
> > 
> > Woody is pretty outdated.  The current "stable" version 
is "Sarge" 
> aka Debian
> > 3.1.  I'm going to stop there, and advise you to spend a while 
> looking at
> > Debian's website where they describe the versions.
> > 
> > My suggestion is to find a spare PC, and try Ubuntu, and 
Knoppix, 
> and
> > Debian. Load one, play with it, load the next, play with it, 
etc.  
> You will
> > learn a lot in the process.
> > 
> > To answer your question regarding 3.0 with R2, R4, and R6... 
they 
> were all
> > "woody".  I think it's correct to say they all have the same 
> functionality, but
> > just different security updates etc.  When there were enough 
> patches to make it
> > worthwhile they would do a "release" and the CD vendors would 
> update their
> > masters.  Most people just "apt-get" their way to the new 
patches 
> and don't
> > focus much on the releases.
> > 
> > Good luck,
> > Joe
> > 
> > > 
> > > Up to now, I've been only developing on cygwin, but I want to 
> use a 
> > > Linux host.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Eduardo
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> >
>







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

Disclaimer: Neither Andrew Taylor nor the University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering take any responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU