Subject: | Re: Shotgun mic Vs on-board mics |
---|---|
From: | "umashankar" umashanks |
Date: | Sat Jul 19, 2014 1:52 am ((PDT)) |
well it was not private, but I agree with you 100 per cent. matching for po= wer transfer went out with human powered telephones. umashankar From: " [naturerecordists]" <naturerecordists@= yahoogroups.com> To: Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 2:13 PM Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: Shotgun mic Vs on-board mics Hi John, I'm replying privately because I'm sure that the impedance matching theory = posted by David is pure nonsense. Impedance matching in audio applications was only required in ancient times= where electronic amplifiers were not available or too expensive (one examp= le is the 600 ohm telephone system). What you wrote is=A0all correct and=A0makes=A0sense! Best, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Shotgun mic Vs on-board mics, raimundspecht |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Shotgun mic Vs on-board mics - optimum noise impedance, brini |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Shotgun mic Vs on-board mics, raimundspecht |
Next by Thread: | Re: Shotgun mic Vs on-board mics, raimundspecht |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU