Subject: | Re: Good mics, medium mics, the best mics - what's the difference on |
---|---|
From: | rock_scallop |
Date: | Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:39 pm ((PDT)) |
Hi Curtis,=0D If by "good" to "best" you mean higher self noise to less self noise, I'm n= ot sure how to quantify it on a 1-10 scale, because it all depends on what = exactly you are trying to record. For quieter soundscape locations there wi= ll be greater noticeable difference than for more robust soundscape locatio= ns, and some types of sounds mask the self-noise better than others. =0D =0D Here is a wild guess, and I'm not an acoustics expert, but If there is a wa= y to apply the sound level dampening over distance rule where we hear a sou= nd level drop of 6 dB per doubling of distance, maybe we could say that a 6= dB decrease in self-noise would allow us to hear twice the distance for a = given location. Of course that would be a gross generalization.=0D =0D John Hartog=0D rockscallop.org |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Good mics, medium mics, the best mics - what's the difference on, Paul Willison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Good mics, medium mics, the best mics - what's the difference on, brini |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Good mics, medium mics, the best mics - what's the difference on, Paul Willison |
Next by Thread: | Re: Good mics, medium mics, the best mics - what's the difference on, brini |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU