David, Thank you for your coments, they are precious to me.=0D
=0D
=0D
"The depth which I liked before was missing"=0D
=0D
=0D
I think so, the Faulkner array was 20 cm apart parallel.=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
"The loud call in the recording sounded a bit to the left, but on analysin=
g =0D
it, this was because it was about 3-4 dB louder on the left track.(...)Poss=
ibly some interaction with a windshield or windshield affected the levels "=
=0D
=0D
=0D
I think it is because in my blumlein recordings with fig8 front to front a=
t 90=C2=BA.=0D
One channel with the same gain was some db above the other so I was tryin=
g to compensate and put more gain in the channel in the preamp during the =
recording. And the windshild is a very tick fake fur with 9cm hair.=0D
=0D
=0D
https://soundcloud.com/freitojos/14040600z-blumlein-fake-fur-hpf-400hz-amp=
l-8db-ribeira-abaixo-1003 https://soundcloud.com/freitojos/14040600z-blumle=
in-fake-fur-hpf-400hz-ampl-8db-ribeira-abaixo-1003=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
In this one I have put some 3 or 4 db in the left channel I think in the A=
udacity.=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
I am going to experiment your sugestion wich is easy to implement in my d=
iy Faulkner/ortf array:=0D
=0D
=0D
"Try a 45-45 degree array with the two fig-8 mics 170 to 200 mm apart whic=
h =0D
=0D
will give you both volume stereo and time difference stereo. This is the =
=0D
theory with the ORTF array."=0D
=0D
=0D
45-45 I think is ORTF 90=C2=BA is it not? =0D
=0D
=0D
klas, I am listening in headphones and in speakers 2 mt apart in a 60=C2=
=BA angle my head in the vertice. =0D
=0D
=0D
best regards, =0D
Jos=C3=A9 =0D
=0D
|