naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 8020s are all right with me!

Subject: Re: 8020s are all right with me!
From: "Eric Benjamin" ericbenjamin2
Date: Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:16 pm ((PDT))
Nick Dando wrote:=C2=A0
> the newer mikes are much cheaper than the old troopers.
Hmm. =C2=A0Here in the US the prices are pretty much the same for the new a=
nd old models. =C2=A0The MKH20 and MKH8020 are $1200. =C2=A0The MKH40 and M=
KH8040 are both $1200. =C2=A0The MKH30 is $1250 but there is no equivalent =
in the new product line.


From: Nick Dando <>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] 8020s are all right with me!



=C2=A0
So, is the preference still for the tried and tested MKH 20s over the newer=
 8020s? Or is there another omni mike that people swear by - I have a pair =
of DPA 4060s - as I'd like to get some full size mikes for location work. I=
 notice that the Instruction Manual for the MKH 20 doesn't mention temperat=
ure ranges or to keep the mikes dry, which the guide for the 8020 specifica=
lly mentions.

I saw Chris Watson's set-up at the Wildeye beginners' =C2=A0course back in =
2012 and he was using 8000 series microphones in an M-S rig and he has a te=
ndency to stick them where the conditions are a tad harsh.

The thing that puzzles me is that the newer mikes are much cheaper than the=
 old troopers.

Nick



On 22 Apr 2014, at 01:47,  wrote:

=C2=A0
>> When Sennheiser came out with their 8000-series mics, some nature record=
ists tried the MKH 8020 as a replacement for the tried-and-true MKH 20 omni=
 mic. The offered improvements are smaller size and extended high frequency=
 response to 60 KHz.
>>
>> Vicky Powys, for one, tried them and reported noise generation when used=
 in the field. They were returned to the regional office for repair but tha=
t was ineffective.
>
>Dan,
>
>I use bat detectors and there is quite a lot of ultrasound around which we=

>are not normally aware of. I wonder if this is another case where an
>extended HF sensitivity is the cause of problems, perhaps not in the mic b=
ut
>in later stages.
>
>> At El Polin Spring the humidity was 90% and everything was soaked with c=
ondensation from dusk to dawn. They performed perfectly.
>
>Good to hear that the latest MKH's still work well wet.
>
>David Brinicombe
>
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU