naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

3. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts

Subject: 3. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts
From: "Avocet" madl74
Date: Mon Jan 7, 2013 5:37 pm ((PST))
> My explanation of the phenomenon goes like this: each amp has its
> own random noise, so summed together they add 3 dB of noise. But the
> two-amp configuration increases the signal by 6 dB, so there's a 3
> dB improvement in signal-to-noise.

Dan,

The alternative connections I envisaged are two inputs at -6dB into a
balanced input or the whole signal going into an unbalanced input, not
half of what is available.

I've spent some time with the INA163 data sheet, and it is basically
very good. However, the EIN figures at low gain are poor due to a high
output stage noise level, and the quote appears to be at 60dB gain
setting which is high for general field recording. A studio mixer
could easily have the gain resistor on a preset, but it can't be
easily incorporated into a fader in a portable mixer. Switched
preset perhaps.

What may be a problem for battery use is the twin rail power supply.
The minimum rail to rail voltage is 9V - the end point of a 12V
battery. At 10ma current per stereo stage, the battery requirement for
a standby device is getting a bit high. I may have a play with one -
with a transformer. :-)

David

David Brinicombe
North Devon, UK
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU