Subject: | 2. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts |
---|---|
From: | "Avocet" madl74 |
Date: | Mon Jan 7, 2013 5:37 pm ((PST)) |
> Yes, the phase response could be an issue at very low sample rates, > such as at 22.05 kHz, as David explained. However, at a sample rate > of 44.1 or 48 kHz, the roll-off of the anti-aliasing filter is > already sufficinetly far away from the upper limit of the human > hearing curve. Dan, We're conflating two ideas, let me clarify. Phase response as altered by any LPF will change the shapes of transients. Our ears are responsive to transients and don't just hear in terms of a frequency response. I must do some experiments to confirm this supposition. :-) David David Brinicombe North Devon, UK Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 1. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 3. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts, Avocet |
Previous by Thread: | 2. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts, Avocet |
Next by Thread: | 2. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts, Raimund |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU