Subject: | 3. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts |
---|---|
From: | "William" werainey |
Date: | Sat Jan 5, 2013 6:29 pm ((PST)) |
One reason would be examining recordings of animal sounds that extend into the ultrasonic. A reasonable number of nominal 'audio' microphones perform decently in the lower ultrasonic. Bill R. > > This post of Greg's brings up an interesting question for a hearing impaired > person like myself. Even using both my hearing aids, I don't hear anything > above 9K. Even people who hear well, as I understand it, rarely hear 20K. So, > the question is, why should a preamp be called on to amplify frequencies > above 20 K if nobody can hear it? I frequently see references to magnitudes > above 20K; I'm guessing this is purely techno babble. I realise of course > that these frequencies are real, but humans can't hear them any more than > they can see in the infra red. > I feel sure that there's a perfectly logical, if complex reason for this, and > perhaps it's not easy to explain simply, but if it is I'd be interested to > hear it. > Cheers > Max |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Nature Recordists] Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts, Max |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 4. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts, Max Catterwell |
Previous by Thread: | 2. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts, Eric Benjamin |
Next by Thread: | 3. Re: Olympus LS-14 initial thoughts, Gregory O'Drobinak |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU