Subject: | Re: EIN values for LS10-11 on Avisoft |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund" animalsounds |
Date: | Mon Dec 3, 2012 1:56 pm ((PST)) |
> Does that mean that their implementation of 24 bit recording is better than > the others Yes. > But I think Robin's question was about why people seem to be recommending use > the low range, when both ranges have similar noise levels. Due to the larger resulting dynamic range, a low gain would be better in this case. > Is it that the best range to use is the one that results in the dial being > the highest for that particular application, and that this often turns out to > be the low range? Right. Regards, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: EIN values for LS10-11 on Avisoft, Peter Shute |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: EIN values for LS10-11 on Avisoft, G |
Previous by Thread: | Re: EIN values for LS10-11 on Avisoft, Peter Shute |
Next by Thread: | Re: EIN values for LS10-11 on Avisoft, G |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU