[Top] [All Lists]

Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?

Subject: Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?
From: "vickipowys" vpowys
Date: Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:14 am ((PST))

I would presume that a SSM demo track without any information given,
would be free from manipulation.

Based on the fact that you are demonstrating a product that is for
sale, and that if the track had been manipulated then that would be
false advertising?

Nothing wrong with post producing but you must say so!


On 13/11/2012, at 11:47 AM, Klas Strandberg wrote:

> Keith,
> Still thinking. I will come back to you.
> First: I wish I could make a poll on this list:
> "When you hear a Telinga SSM demo track at the Telinga site or
> SoundCloud, and there is no information about it, do you presume
> that...
> 1/ the track is raw, free from any kind of manipulation, or
> 2/ a end result, post produced to give the best sound?
> And based on what?
> Klas.
> Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
> S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
> Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
> email: 
> website:

"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU